(Sculpture by Nathan Coley)
On the 7th of August, having just arrived back from Barbados the previous afternoon, I packed my bags and boarded a train to Edinburgh with the two other girls in my History of Art A level group on a trip partially funded by our school's PTA. The main purpose of the trip was to visit the galleries that Scotland has to offer, with some stellar exhibitions currently on show at the National Gallery and at the Modern Gallery in Edinburgh. The exhibitions I am about to talk about, the Van Gogh to Kandinsky - Symbolist Landscape in Europe 1880-1910 and the Picasso and Modern British Art, were the highlights of the trip despite having seen a street performer balance on a ladder whilst juggling machetes...
When we arrived after an endlessly long train journey and a confusion caused by maps that didn't show that Edinburgh is built as two levels of city, we dropped our bags off at our hostel and made our way to the National Gallery to see the Van Gogh to Kandinsky exhibition.
The building that houses the galleries is beautiful in itself, an ode to classical architecture with ionic capitals on slim pillars in a gorgeous milky yellow stone. However, this was secondary to the beauty captured in the landscapes shown in the exhibition. I walk around exhibitions noting down on the notes section of my iphone any piece of art that catches my eye, and I don't think it would be possible for me to talk about every piece that I liked as there were just too many! Symbolism was a movement that I had not studied other than a very brief overview and so I was keen to understand more about it. The tortured emotions that are common in symbolist painting, seen in artists such as Munch's work, translate well to landscape - the sky being a particularly good means of expressing emotion.
I love colour in art, not garish bright colours, but the right combination of muted tones in many of these pieces by well known artists such as Van Gogh, Monet, Kandinsky, Munch and Whistler alongside those of lesser known artists. A particular favourite piece in the exhibition was one by an artist of whom I had never heard (and whose name I could not pronounce!). The pieces were called 'Sparks 1 2 and 3' by Lithuanian artist Mikalojus Konstantinas Ciurlionis, and are shown below (image courtesy of Irkm.lt) I loved the blended peach and lilac tones of the piece, despite my usual aversion to typically 'girly' colours.
Another piece that I loved because of the artists use of colour was 'Calm Before The Storm' by Hans Thoma. The vibrant yellow of the field is countered by the brooding grey of the sky and deep green of the trees which break up what would be a harsh divide between horizon and sky the grey developing into swirling brown tones of the clouds. The colours seem at odds with one another creating a sense of unease and tension, and relating the artist view of the calm before a storm perfectly. (image courtesy of kunstmuseenkrefeld.de)
These pieces were my two favourites from the exhibition, I invested in the exhibition guide so that I can continue to look at all the beautiful works and learn more about symbolism, which I had not studied in depth. This exhibition was beautifully curated, the pieces grouped according to certain themes, with a room with works drawing on Greek Mythology being of particular interest. I can recommend it to anyone, it will certainly be appreciated by those who enjoy looking at landscape paintings, but with the added depth of meaning.
The next day we got up early in order to make our way to Edinburgh's modern gallery, which according to our various different maps was a little way out of the main town. It seemed like forever walking there in the scorching heat (I know - no rain in Scotland?!) but eventually we got there. It was worth the walk. The Picasso exhibition was enthralling, with his work displayed alongside those it had inspired later, including artists such as Ben Nicholson, Henry Moore and Fancis Bacon. As someone who really does not see the excitement in Cubism, I did at first think that areas of the exhibition featuring the movement would not interest me, but seeing how the movement inspired other artists in the future and why made me appreciate the style, although I still would not want to see an exhibition of purely Cubist works.
Francis Bacon's early works, that were inspired by Picasso, were particularly interesting to see, as the artist destroyed much of this early work, so not many pieces survive. The series of crucifixions interested me as I completed one of my AS level Fine Art projects on the theme of crucifixion and had not come across these works by Bacon in my research. These pieces have the same haunting quality of the figures in Picasso's work depicting strange figures, but has a more fluid quality, it lacks the angles seen in Picasso's figures. Bacon's work is far more to my taste than that of Picasso however, even the grotesque orange triptych 'Three Studies for Figures at the Base of a Crucifixion' shown below (image courtesy of alexandervanhaaften.com) The vivid orange is what first draws your eye to the piece from across the room, then taken around the piece by the contorted bodies with elongated necks. His depiction of the surrounding space is like that in Picasso's 'Guernica' and the figures are distorted, showing clearly the influence of Picasso's work on Bacon's early works.
It is worth a trip up to Edinburgh to enjoy the beautiful city and see these two fantastic exhibitions, which are engaging and eye opening. The Symbolist landscapes although melancholy at times are uplifting in their beauty, the Picasso exhibition shows the enormous influence that one man can have over the artistic styles and tastes of artists long after he has gone.